Sociology of Guns Module 10: Police Use of Force

Questions and controversies around police use of force are not new, but have been animated by a spate of high profile cases in recent years resulting in the death of black Americans, including Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Tamir Rice, Walter Scott, Alton Sterling, Philando Castile, Breonna Taylor, Daunte Wright, and of course, George Floyd.

Although there is plenty of evidence of racism in our criminal justice system (as Radley Balko exhaustively documents, h/t Khal), and these cases are for many prima facie evidence of the same, as a sociologist I still cling to Peter Berger’s contention that “the first wisdom of sociology is this – things are not what they seem.” Of course, they may be what they seem, but our job is not to assume but rather to dig deeper.

This module tries to answer the question, What does the best contemporary scholarship tell us about police use of force, and especially racial disparities in use of force?

In addition to our reading (helpfully suggested by top policing scholars Justin Nix, Michael Sierra-Arevalo, and Kyle McLean), I am pleased to again welcome 21 year veteran of law enforcement, notably undercover narcotics work, and leading self-defense trainer Craig Douglas who will bring his Experiential Learning Lab to class.

Students role playing in a police use of force scenario created by trainer Craig Douglas, Sociology of Guns Seminar, Spring 2019.

Required readings for Module 10 are:

Recommended readings for Module 10 are:

I don’t take the recommended readings to be comprehensive or complete. Suggestions are welcome.

Published by David Yamane

Sociologist at Wake Forest U, student of gun culture, tennis player, racket stringer (MRT), whisk(e)y drinker, bow-tie wearer, father, husband. Not necessarily in that order.

5 thoughts on “Sociology of Guns Module 10: Police Use of Force

  1. I’ll steal that. The first wisdom of earth science is this – things are not always what they seem. Of course, they may be what they seem, but our job is not to assume but rather to dig deeper.

    That’s beautiful.

    I just read two papers, I think either in Nature or Science, where current climate models are predicting really high warming rates, likely due to high ECS/TCS factors. So high the modellers don’t believe the models and are going back to the drawing board to figure it out. But what if the models are right? 5 deg C per doubling is shit-your-pants scary stuff for policy makers and future planners.

    https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/07/un-climate-panel-confronts-implausibly-hot-forecasts-future-warming

    Anyway, that’s off the subject but that kind of climate change will make use of force a lesser concern.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.